Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tommy Owens v. Earl Butler
as 16-6250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
EARL MOOSE BUTLER, Sheriff and SHERIFF WRIGHT
Jones v. Cumberland County et al
as 5:2012ct03160
Plaintiff:
Jerry Quincy Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. Cumberland County, Cumberland County, Chub Group of Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cumberland County et al
as 4:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jerry Quincy Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. Cumberland County, Cumberland County, Chub Group of Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Carter v. Earl Butler
as 11-7732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD CLARK CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
EARL MOOSE BUTLER, Sheriff of Cumberland County, North Carolina and RACHEL PHILPOTT CHOQUE
Gary Alston, Jr. v. Major John McRainey
as 11-7220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MICHAEL ALSTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCRAINEY, Major, EARL MOOSE BUTLER, Sheriff and CORPORAL CARL
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
John Leggett v. Earl Butler
as 10-6593
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN A. LEGGETT
Respondent - Appellee:
EARL MOOSE BUTLER and ROY A. COOPER, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
