Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Eccles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01402
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Eccles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. O'Malley et al
as 5:2016cv14077
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Smith , Steven Graysmark , John Eccles and others
Defendant:
Kelly O'Malley, Escrow and Title Services Inc. and Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Smith et al v. O'Malley et al
as 2:2016cv14070
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Smith, Steven Graysmark, John Eccles and others
Defendant:
Kelly O'Malley, Escrow and Title Services Inc. and Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
William Eccles, et al v. Owners Insurance Company
as 16-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ECCLES and MIACHEL HANCOCK-ECCLES
Defendant - Appellee:
OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Eccles et al v. Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Eccles and Miachel Hancock-Eccles
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Owners Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
William Eccles and Miachel Hancock-Eccles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus Eccles v. Kylie Woods, et al
as 11-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ANTHONY ECCLES
Defendant - Appellee:
KYLIE WOODS, Assistant Librarian, CRIS HENSON, Librarian Manager, AMANDA WINNICKI, Librarian/Supervisor and others
Eccles #291757 v. Woods, et al
as 2:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Eccles #291757
Defendant:
Kylie Woods, Cris Henson, Amanda Winnicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford v. Geren et al
as 5:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christy Rutherford and Christy Rutherford
Defendant:
Pete Geren, Larry J. Lust, Frederick Swope and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
