Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Eduardo Lopez v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03001
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Olvera v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Angelica Olvera
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Eduardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montemayor v. Chudasama
as 21-10988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marco A. Montemayor
Defendant / Appellee:
Nia Chudasama, Officer, Neptune Ventures LLC, Daniel Brooks, Trustee/Independent Bank, David R. Brooks, CEO of Independent Bank and others
Montemayor v. Chudasama et al
as 3:2021cv02252
Plaintiff:
Marco A Montemayor
Defendant:
Nia Chudasama, Daniel W Brooks, David R Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States v. Melquiades Lopez-Del Angel
as 21-2509
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Melquiades Lopez-Del Angel, also known as Eduardo Lopez-Corpus, also known as Nacho
Lopez-Rivera v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv01451
Petitioner:
Eduardo Lopez-Rivera
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez-Rivera v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2021cv00305
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez-Rivera
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv25137
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez and Vicsel Sanchez
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Lopez-Sanchez v. Attorney General United States
as 20-3283
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOSE EDUARDO LOPEZ-SANCHEZ
Eduardo Lopez Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv09875
Defendant:
Matthew James Perez, Marc Antrim, Christopher Myung Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
