Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Eduardo Lopez-Vargas v. B. Antonelli
as 19-6422
Respondent / Appellee:
B. M. ANTONELLI, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDUARDO LOPEZ-VARGAS
v. Lopez et al
as 3:2019cv00822
Defendant:
Eduardo Lopez Lopez, Gypsum Management and Supply, Inc. and Pacific Gypsum Supply, Inc. d/b/a J&B Materials, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Pacific Gypsum Supply, Inc.,et.al
as 4:2019cv00823
Defendant:
Gypsum Management and Supply, Inc., Pacific Gypsum Supply, Inc. d/b/a J&B Materials, Inc., Pacific Gypsum Supply, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendoza-Perez et al v. Dhillon
as 1:2019cv00722
Plaintiff:
Santana Cardenas, Victor Manuel Sanchez, Eduardo Lopez-Romero and others
Defendant:
Uttam Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Biscotti et al
as 0:2018cv63048
Defendant:
Angelcira Lopez, Eduardo Lopez and Lisa Biscotti
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lopez-Gomez v. Patterson - UTI Drilling Company, LLC
as 2:2018cv00962
Defendant:
Patterson - UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robles v. Lopez et al
as 4:2018cv00424
Defendant:
Gabriel Alexander Sproule, Eduardo Lopez and Roman Acosta
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eduardo Lopez-Gonzalez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71972
Petitioner:
EDUARDO LOPEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Lopez et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez and Silvia A Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America and Jose Ascencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
