Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Jones v. Synan et al
as 1:2015cv01031
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Synan, Mark Murphy, Julian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Mitchell
as 5:2015hc02041
Petitioner:
Antoine Edward Davis
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. President of South Africa et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
President of South Africa, Iraq, Kuwait and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2013cv32308
Plaintiff:
John Edward Davis and Gloria A. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Ajax Magnethermic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinette v. Antea Group, et al
as 1:2012cv06213
Plaintiff:
Samantha L. Robinette and Thomas Edward Davis
Defendant:
Antea Group and Katey Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
NC Supported Employment v. NC Dpt. of Health & Human Srv.
as 10-2426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTHERN CAROLINA SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT, SENECA NICHOLSON and ALAN PITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, EDWARD DAVIS, STACY THOMPSON and others
Cameron v. Phillips et al
as 7:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Richard James Cameron
Defendant:
L.C. Edwards Davis, C. M. Hamilton, JJ Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Carolina Supported Employment et al v. NC Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
Northern Carolina Supported Employment, Seneca Nicholson and Alan Pitts
Defendant:
NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Vocation Rehabilitation, Henderson Office, Edward Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
US v. John Davis
as 09-8127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
