Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michael Houston v. Bryan Hettenbach, et al
as 24-1435
Plaintiff: Michael J. Houston
Defendant: Bryan Hettenbach, Jenniffer E. Matthew, Annette Llewellyn and others
Houston v. Hettenbach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01717
Plaintiff: Michael J. Houston
Defendant: Bryan L. Hettenbach, Jenniffer E. Matthew, Annette Llewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEENEY v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEENEY v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEENEY v. USA
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Aaron Robinson v. Matt Waltz, et al
as 21-3899
Plaintiff / Appellant: Aaron Robinson
Defendant / Appellee: Matt Waltz, Tanya Engelhardt, Edward Sweeney, Jr., Judge and others
SWEENEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00330
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. KRAMER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00156
Defendant: CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA and HAROLD D. KRAMER
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Waltz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01662
Defendant: Matthew Waltz, Taylor Lynn Richard, Clinton Wright and others
Plaintiff: Aaron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. VANDERHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00463
Respondent: FRANK VANDERHILL
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?