Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. 025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2034 West Lanvale Street et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Defendant: .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2034 West Lanvale Street, 2008 DRR-ETS LLC, EDWARD F GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Langford et al
as 2:2023cv01372
Not Classified By Court: Darlene Mary Ellender Langford
Plaintiff: Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant: Joel Edward Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Takings Claim/Expropriation
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant: Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Defendant: Kimberly Yvonne Begay, Hazel R Silverhorn, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 1.77 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY), 9.55 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, 0.05 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT A et al
as 3:2022cv00236
Plaintiff: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Defendant: 1.77 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY), 9.55 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, 0.05 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT A, Texas Reunion, LLLP, Boa Sorte Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
as 7:2022cv00324
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.04 Acres of Land, Owned by Ronald B. Edwards, Sr., Gloria Martin, Terrance Edwards, Linda White, Ruby Penn, Janis E. Waller, Crystal Diane Edwards, and Penny Edwards Blue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 7:2021cv00358
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, City of Roma, Rosario G Cuellar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant: Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff: United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?