Cases 31 - 40 of 10,928
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Weinhaus v. Scannicchio et al
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Edward "Coach" Weinhaus
Defendant:
Regina A Scannicchio and Illinois Judges Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Humphrey v. Modesto Police Department
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Modesto Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. California Highway Patrol
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cotton v. Shalk et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cotton
Defendant:
Jennifer Shalk, Doe 1 and Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
