Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jackson-Mackay v. Gunther et al
as 5:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
David A Jackson-Mackay
Defendant:
Warden Jason Gunther, Elizabeth Ortiz, Kristie Mathieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10403
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ORTIZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosario v. 2022 Eastchester LLC
as 22-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alexandra Rosario, Elizabeth Ortiz and Amadou Camara
Defendant / Appellant:
2022 Eastchester LLC, Frank Cotto and Noboru Takashima
Bexar Diversified MF-1, LLC, v. General Star Indemnity Company, et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Bexar Diversified MF-1, LLC d/b/a Bexar Management by and through its assignees, Lucky Honorable Dragon Holdings, LLC, Series 135E and Minstat Holdings, LLC, Series 135E
Defendant:
General Star Indemnity Company and Elizabeth Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. City of San Diego, et al
as 3:2021cv01990
Plaintiff:
Lance Black
Defendant:
City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department, San Diego County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Word et al v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv02235
Plaintiff:
Clayton Word and Roxanne-Louise Wuco Word
Defendant:
San Diego Police Department Officers Larry Astair, City of San Diego, Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Rosario et al v. 2022 Eastchester LLC et al
as 1:2020cv09182
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Rosario, Amadou Camara and Elizabeth Ortiz
Defendant:
2022 Eastchester LLC, Frank Cotto and Noboru Takashima
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Ortiz
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Carolyn Elizabeth Ortiz and Carolyn Elizabeth Ortiz individually doing business as Sanctum Ale House
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
