Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Jones v. Polk County District Court et al
as 6:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Galveston District Court Judge, Polk County District Court and Polunsky Unit
Petitioner:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elvis Jones v. US National Federal Debt, et al
as 18-12570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
US NATIONAL FEDERAL DEBT CONTRACTORS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS and DIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP
JONES v. US NATIONAL FEDERAL DEBT CONTRACTORS et al
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
US NATIONAL FEDERAL DEBT CONTRACTORS, US TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIVERSTIY OF INTERNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The TDCS Polinsky Disciplinary Captains
as 9:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
The TDCS Polinsky Disciplinary Captains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. TDCS Polunsky Disciplinary Captains
as 1:2017cv05203
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
TDCS Polunsky Disciplinary Captains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges et al
as 9:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges, The Texas Board Pardons and Paroles and The Texas Allan B. Polunsky Monitored Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges et al
as 6:2017cv06640
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
The Texas U.S. District Courts Judges, The Texas Board Pardons and Paroles and The Texas Allan B. Polunsky Monitored Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
