Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Emerick #322924 v. Shinn
as 2:2026cv05617
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Emerick
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Cornachia et al
as 1:2026cv03028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hutchinson
Defendant:
Bethany Cornachia, Tichnell, Sgt. T. Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Campbell et al
as 3:2026cv03185
Plaintiff:
James A Cox
Defendant:
Steven Campbell, Denessa Armstrong, Stephanie Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FATA v. LANG et al
as 5:2026cv03661
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
CHARLES LANG, MARTHA LANG, PAMELA PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Abendroth v. Kaskaskia Medical Center, LTD et al
as 3:2026cv00595
Defendant:
Thomas Ray Clark, Jr, Angelica Arroyo, Kaskaskia Medical Center, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler C. Abendroth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Speagle v. Emerick et al
as 3:2026cv00547
Plaintiff:
Billy A. Speagle
Defendant:
Kathleen Ann Emerick and Alicia M. Granito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerick v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 5:2026cv02023
Plaintiff:
Donald Emerick
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Emerick
as 2:2026cv02023
Plaintiff:
Donald Emerick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Randolph Jr. v. Harbaugh et al
as 1:2026cv00681
Plaintiff:
Juan Alex Randolph Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Harbaugh, Kristine Swik, J. Phillips and others
Interested Party:
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv13732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
