Cases 31 - 40 of 398
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Diaz v. Cantu
as 24-50026
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant:
Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Maverick County Judge, Roxanna Rios, Commissioner Precinct 2, Olga Ramos, Commissioner Precinct 3 and others
Williams v. Village of Junction City et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Casey Williams
Defendant:
Village of Junction City and Amy English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv06408
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HINES v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Robert Hines
Defendant:
Valerie Jones, Christopher Dille, Tyler Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAMROUD et al v. STOLTE et al
as 3:2023cv22615
In Re:
MAMROUD
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MAMROUD
Respondent:
MAGISTRATE BARBARA STOLTE, BRIAN ENGLISH, MATTHEW PLATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
