Cases 1 - 10 of 33
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25911
Plaintiff:
ERIC BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08436
Plaintiff:
ERIC BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leonard Walker v. Eric Baker
as 23-1232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD GREGORY WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BAKER, Corrections Officer sued in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker #651851 v. Baker
as 2:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Leonard Gregory Walker #651851
Defendant:
Eric Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Baker v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2022cv08447
Defendant:
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, County Of Westchester, Westchester Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Baker, Gail Baker and Eric Baker, By Guardian ad Litem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. BAKER et al
as 2:2022cv05800
Plaintiff:
KYREE TAYLOR
Defendant:
DWAYNE ERIC BAKER, BOBS DISCOUNT FURNITURE LLC and RYDER SYSTEM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
(PC) Gulbronson v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv01296
Plaintiff:
Eric Conrad Gulbronson
Defendant:
Gena Jones, J. Peterson, Fergus Leckie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
