Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Igiehon v. Ally Servicing LLC
as 5:2026cv13506
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Igiehon
Defendant:
Ally Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cooke v. Igloo Products Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05227
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Cooke
Defendant:
Igloo Products Corp., TARGET CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Eric Kiss v. P. Edmond, et al
as 26-12067
Plaintiff:
ERIC DANIEL KISS
Defendant:
P. EDMOND, DEMPSEY, SUMMERS and others
Crutchfield v. USP McCreary
as 6:2026cv00171
Petitioner:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Respondent:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel v. Superintendent
as 1:2025cv10489
Petitioner:
Eric Daniel
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-3194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvarez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11662
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Andres Alvarez, Jonathan Charles Amundson, Rachel Joellen Argenziano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Corder et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11432
Plaintiff:
Jaushua Corder, George Cordero, Jennifer Corneliussen and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniel v. Superintendent
as 1:2025cv05251
Petitioner:
Eric Daniel
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lidgett v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2025cv02297
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Lidgett
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
