Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Brumfield v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv11847
Plaintiff:
William Brumfield
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin , Eric Holder, Bob Laski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
v. Burger et al
as 1:2014cv01342
Defendant:
William Burger, Carolyn W Colvin and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Osborne v. Colvin
as 8:2014cv00020
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Eric Holder, Jr.
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jerry Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lillard v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lillard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, David Rivera and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pratt v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Pratt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, David Rivera AUSA and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnes v. Astrue et al
as 5:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Hilda Rose Barnes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric Holder, Jr., Office of Program Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HODGES v. GROCHOWSKI
as 4:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
TOMMY DWAYNE HODGES
Defendant:
MICHAEL W GROCHOWSKI, DAVID BLACK, MARY ANN SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Dwight Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric Holder, Jr. , Neil H. MacBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cockrill v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Myka Denise Cockrill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, SSA-Email Notification, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Donald v. Asture
as 2:2011cv02434
Defendant:
Edward Stanton, Eric Holder, Chief Counsel Regional and others
Petitioner:
Mary Lavern Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
