Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carlo Vartinelli v. Aramark Correctional Services, et al
as 19-1428
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware for Profit Corporation, K. ROUNDS, Jointly and Severally, SHELIA BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLO VARTINELLI
Magee v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Magee, Jr
Defendant:
Wanda Johnson, Eric J Foss, Warden Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vartinelli v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2018cv10964
Plaintiff:
Carlo Vartinelli
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Eric J. Foss, Melvin Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric J. Foss and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kucharski v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00780
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kucharski
Defendant:
Eric J Foss , Roman Martinez, IV , William D Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kucharski v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kucharski
Defendant:
Eric J Foss, Roman Martinez, IV, William D Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rayapudi v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00653
Plaintiff:
Pradeep Rayapudi
Defendant:
Eric J Foss , Roman Martinez, IV , William D Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Aramark et al
as 1:2016cv01166
Plaintiff:
Moses Ramirez
Defendant:
Aramark, Eric J. Foss, Donald Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodman v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14420
Plaintiff:
Chester Bodman
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Davre Davidson, Bob Marshall and others
Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations et al v. Bey
as 2:2014cv02334
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations, Lee Coffrey, Earnestine Dorsey and others
Defendant:
Maleik Ali Bey
Miscellaneou:
Kevin Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
