Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rios v. Shelton, et al.
as 25-6645
Plaintiff:
ERIC RIOS, an individual
Defendant:
TY SHELTON, Doe 1, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity and DOES, 2-100
Eric Rios v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04782
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Plaintiff:
Eric Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
RIOS PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15027
Plaintiff:
ERIC RIOS PEREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rios v. Standard Insurance Company, The
as 0:2022cv02994
Plaintiff:
Eric Rios
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rios v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Eric Rios
Respondent:
Warden D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. City of Plano et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Allen
Defendant:
City of Plano, Plano Police Department, Plano SWAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIOS JESUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03491
Plaintiff:
ERIC RIOS JESUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67884
Plaintiff:
ERIC RIOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rios v. United States Of America
as 7:2021cv00182
Not Classified By Court:
Eric Rios
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McElligott et al v. Advance Auto Parts et al
as 1:2020cv06712
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, David Hutton, Eric Rios and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McElligott and Natalie Leone-McElligott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
