Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hamilton v. Myers et al
as 3:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Mitchell Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Black Hawk County Jail
as 6:2025cv02059
Plaintiff:
Eric Antawn Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hamilton v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2025cv02575
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Sacramento Sheriff and Sacramento Police Department
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Wellman TD
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Hamilton
Defendant:
Wellman TD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Gavin et al
as 1:2022cv02285
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Larry Gavin, Karen Jones-Hayes, Damita Delitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON-HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11789
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC PATTERSON-HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Acosta et al
as 1:2020cv04436
Defendant:
Juan Acosta and Sean Early
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Burroughs et al
as 1:2020cv03922
Defendant:
Deputy Rojek, Deputy Janovyak, Deputy Wittmayer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2019cv01347
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiqui, Steve Ritz, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Canton's Pearls, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03625
Plaintiff:
Christine Jackson and Megan Blankenship
Defendant:
Canton's Pearls, LLC and Eric K. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
