Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Sunny Jani, et al v. National Football League, et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-02077
Plaintiff:
Sunny Jani , Roger Craig , Vernessia Craig and others
Defendant:
National Football League , NFL Properties LLC , Riddell, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Shannon Elion
Sunny Jani, et al v. National Football League, et al
as 2:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Rufus Alexander, Brian W. Alford, James Allen and others
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Shannon Elion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hunter v. Astrue(CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hunter
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hunter v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hunter
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hunter v. Birkey et al
as 1:2010cv01235
Petitioner:
Ernest Hunter
Respondent:
Richard S Birkey and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUNTER et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 8:2009cv02198
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HUNTER and FLORENCE HUNTER
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and SIDNEY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HUNTER et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2009cv00697
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HUNTER and FLORENCE HUNTER
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and SIDNEY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FEAMSTER-THOMPSON v. HUNTER et al
as 2:2009cv00702
Plaintiff:
ROSE FEAMSTER-THOMPSON
Defendant:
ERNEST HUNTER and DOLLAR RENT-A-CAR
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
