Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ramori Rogers, Sr. v. Gallion, et al
as 22-15939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMORI VAUGHN ROGERS, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GALLION, Unknown; named as S.I.S. Gallion, S.I.S., "Investigator" at USP Tucson, AMANDA STANGL, named as Case Manager Amanda Stangl, E-1 Case Manager at USP Tucson, BYLER, Unknown; named as Counselor Mr. Byler, E-1-E-2 Counselor at USP Tucson and others
Harris v. Espenoza et al
as 3:2019cv07806
Plaintiff:
Michael Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Espenoza and Sgt. Borosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giuseppe Giudice v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1869
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE GIUDICE, a/k/a Joe Giudice
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
STEVEN ABRAMS, PAUL W. SCHMIDT, LORY D. ROSENBERG, Esq. and others
Keith v. Espenoza et al
as 5:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeff Keith
Defendant:
NFN Espenoza, NFN Nobles, NFN McDonalys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Espenoza et al
as 8:2016cv02287
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel T. Espenoza, Daniel Espinoza, Jr. and Victor Almaraz-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez-Blandon v. Papoi et al
as 3:2009cv01552
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gutierrez-Blandon
Defendant:
Catherine M. Papoi, Jill Eggleston, Catrina Pavlik-Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Puckett et al v. Irwin County Detention Center
as 7:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Luther Puckett, James Donaldson, Jose Arellano and others
Defendant:
Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
