Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BARRY v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2021cv03718
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BARRY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Barry v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 20-35166
Respondent / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ERIC CUMMINGS and STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Respondent:
GARY SIMPSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE BARRY
Barry v. Simpson
as 3:2018cv06003
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Barry
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Simpson and Gary Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shannan Lynette Wynn et al v. Oprah G. Winfrey et al
as 2:2018cv03279
Defendant:
Lionsgate Entertainment Corporation, ABC, Inc., Oprah G Winfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Pastor Lester Eugene Barrie and Shannan Lynette Wynn
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
Randall Dean Mason
Defendant:
Chad Anderson, Eugene Barry, Bruce Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv03609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv03562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
