Cases 41 - 50 of 81
EDWARDS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF __________ et al
as 2:2016cv03554
Petitioner:
EUGENE EDWARDS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF __________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferdaus v. T & B Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04425
Plaintiff:
Akash Ferdaus
Defendant:
T & B Transport Inc. and Eugene Edward Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Sweeney et al
as 9:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Barbara Ann Sweeney, Barbara Ann Sweeney Irrevocable Living Trust, Naomi R. Leisz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Eugene Hudome
as 15-11614
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EUGENE EDWARD HUDOME
EALY v. COLE et al
as 1:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. EALY, SR.
Defendant:
R. GUY COLE, KARL S. FORESTER, EUGENE EDWARD SILER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Eugene Edward
as 14-4170
Petitioner:
In re: EUGENE EDWARDS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Lawnae Hunter v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01623
Defendant:
Crump Commercial Insurance Services, Inc., Does, Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawnae Hunter
Unknown:
Hee Young Lee
Lawnae Hunter v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07745
Defendant:
Crump Commercial Insurance Services, Inc., Does, Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawnae Hunter
Mitchell Edwards v. Warden Graterford SCI, et al
as 14-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL EUGENE EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN GRATERFORD SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Winder v. Maynard
as 1:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Eugene Edward Winder
Defendant:
Gary Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
