Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Experis US, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01392
Plaintiff:
Scott Harrison
Defendant:
Experis US, Inc. and International Business Machines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Francis v. ManpowerGroup US Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01477
Plaintiff:
Karen Francis
Defendant:
ManpowerGroup US Inc and Experis US Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Runnels v. Experis, US, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Theron Runnels, II
Defendant:
Experis, US, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dunn v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America, A New York Entity et al
as 3:2013cv05456
Defendant:
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America and Experis US, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dunn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
OWINO, et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2012cv01041
Plaintiff:
DAVID O. OWINO , KENDRA L. BURDEAU , KEVIN KAI JUNG CHAN and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and EXPERIS US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sutherland et al v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv01557
Plaintiff:
Robert Sutherland , Paul Hewitt and Forrest Litke
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation , Manpower International, Inc. , Experis US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
