Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Eric Exum v. Lieutenant Donna
as 25-6216
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICARDO EXUM
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT DONNA, SERGEANT JORDAN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II CURTIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilson v. Holmes et al
as 1:2025cv01030
Defendant:
Charles Exum, H. Jack Holmes, Nancy McHaney and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfonzo Exum v. George Little, et al
as 25-1104
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO EXUM
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and JOHN E. WETZEL, et. al.
Googie Harris Sr v. Darryl Exum Esq.
as 5:2025cv00136
Petitioner:
Googie Harris, Sr.
Respondent:
Darryl Exum Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Pattison v. NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise et al
as 3:2025cv00002
Defendant:
NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise, Sandra Walker, C. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Exum v. Attorney General
as 1:2024cv03640
Petitioner:
Eric Ricardo Exum
Respondent:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv24596
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCBRIDE v. LAURIE et al
as 2:2024cv04178
Defendant:
OKEEFE, LAYTOYA JONES, RYAN WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
CUSHMIR MCBRIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Exum v. Kane et al
as 8:2024cv01425
Defendant:
Offit Kurman, PA, BDMG Crestleigh Owner, LLC and Kevin Ian Kane, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Jakia Exum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
