Cases 1 - 10 of 15
City of Charleston v. Brabham Oil Company, Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON
Defendant / Appellant:
BRABHAM OIL COMPANY, INC., COLONIAL GROUP, INC., ENMARK STATIONS, INC. and others
Charleston, City of v. Brabham Oil Company Inc et al
as 2:2020cv03579
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Enmark Stations Inc, BP America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charleston, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Weidman v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 20-1116
Defendant:
F. BUD CARR, KENT DIXON, DANIEL WHITFIELD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. WEIDMAN
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. BP P.L.C.
as 19-1644
Defendant / Appellant:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, LOUISIANA LAND & EXPLORATION CO., CONOCOPHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America et al v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
as 2:2019cv01273
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and United States of America
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 1:2018cv00195
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
United States of America et al v. AAI Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02909
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Maryland
Defendant:
AAI Corporation, City of Baltimore, Maryland, CSX Realty Development, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
as 1:2012cv01979
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Co.
Movant:
Ming T. Tan
Respondent:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Crescenta Valley Water District v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 5:2010mc00033
Plaintiff:
Crescenta Valley Water District
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
Movant:
Darol E. Dodd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
