Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Butler v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Harold F. Butler, III
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. US
as 23-1707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH G. BRADLEY, DENNY W. BRANHAM, ROBERTA L. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRULIN & COMPANY, INC., CHARLES F. BUTLER, BURNETT PARTNERSHIP LLP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Butler et al v. New-Indy Catawba LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02366
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F Butler, Cheryll Riley Clapper, Angela Collins and others
Defendant:
New-Indy Catawba LLC, New-Indy Containerboard LLC, New-Indy Containerboard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Harold Butler, III v. Kevin Myers
as 20-5996
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAROLD F. BUTLER, III
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN MYERS, Acting Warden
A Royal Flush, Inc. v. Arias
as 20-2458
3Rd Party Defendant:
Tibbetts, Keating & Butler, LLC and Timothy F. Butler
Appellant:
A Royal Flush, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Anir Arias
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Butler v. Genovese
as 3:2020cv00141
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Petitioner:
Harold F Butler, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00382
Plaintiff:
Earl F. Butler
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
A Royal Flush, Inc. v. Arias
as 3:2018cv01206
Plaintiff:
A Royal Flush, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Anir Arias
3Rd Party Defendant:
TIBBETTS, KEATING & BUTLER, LLC and Timothy F. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maurice F. Butler v. John Sutton et al
as 2:2017cv08505
Plaintiff:
Maurice F Butler
Defendant:
CCII John Doe, CCIII John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
