Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gooden v. Liebel et al
as 3:2026cv01374
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gooden
Defendant:
David Liebel, Lloyd Arnold and Ron Neal
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Nicholas Purpura
as 26-3260
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, & CO., JAMES DIMON, DEAN COOPER and others
Keaton v. Mississippi Delta Community College et al
as 4:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cameron Keaton
Defendant:
Mississippi Delta Community College, City of Moorhead, Mississippi, Indianola Family Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gooden v. City of Homestead, Florida
as 1:2026cv25348
Plaintiff:
Tayler Palmer Gooden
Defendant:
City of Homestead, Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Nicholas Gooden
as 26-12774
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ANTHONY GOODEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gooden v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv06426
Plaintiff:
Denise Trudy Ann Gooden
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
GOODEN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04228
Plaintiff:
RANVA GOODEN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Selena Gooden
as 26-12132
Petitioner:
In re: SELENA GOODEN
Respondent:
MINORITY LEADER OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
