Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LAWRENCE v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC. et al
as 3:2017cv06404
Plaintiff:
LINDA F. LAWRENCE
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv01433
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ruby F. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01419
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcelino Sanchez Martinez v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2015cv03952
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and F Lawrence
Petitioner:
Marcelino Sanchez Martinez
Martinez v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2015cv00962
Petitioner:
Marcelino Sanchez Martinez
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and F. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Edmund G. Brown, Jr, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21256
Plaintiff:
William F. Lawrence and Shawn Lawrence
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryishie Robinson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 13-3250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYISHIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, an Illinois Municipality, JOHN SONLEY, Chicago Police Officer, RANDALL F. LAWRENCE, Chicago Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
