Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Perrin v. Aviles
as 1:2020cv01384
Defendant:
Dional M. Aviles
Plaintiff:
Connie F. Perrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Emory v. Vincent Mooney, et al
as 17-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN D. EMORY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, CAPTAIN MORRIS, BILGER and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Sutton-El v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02354
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, D. Hudson, D. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Sutton-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv01618
Plaintiff:
Norman Shelton
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, Thomas R. Kane, Joseph Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wiggins v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv01298
Plaintiff:
Ronnie G. Wiggins
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, Chuck Maiorana, Krista Rear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rodarmel et al
as 3:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Matt Rodarmel, Tyrone Wallace, E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2009cv02563
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
B. A. Bledsoe, C. Maiorana, K. Rear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
