Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ahmad et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Irshad Ahmad, Muhammad Tahir Ahmad, Khalid Javed and others
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
MENJIVAR v. WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03311
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO MENJIVAR
Defendant:
ABDULLA SULTAN, FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA and WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. doing business as WOODLEY CAFE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
New York Chicken and Gyro Inc v. Farid Ahmad Ahmadi
as 2:2020cv07170
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK CHICKEN & GYRO INC and New York Chicken and Gyro Inc.
Defendant:
FARID AHMAD AHMADI doing business as New York Style Chicken & Gyro and Farid Ahmad Ahmadi Individually doing business as New York Style Chicken & Gyro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Farid Mangal v. Warden Perry Correctional Inst
as 20-6810
Petitioner / Appellant:
FARID AHMAD MANGAL, a/k/a Farid Ahmad Maugal
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Abarca et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07502
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Petitioner:
Muhammad Abdullah, Dominique Abbott, Marciano Abadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Mangal v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution
as 6:2018cv00106
Petitioner:
Farid Ahmad Mangal
Respondent:
Warden Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AHMAD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 3:2012cv06104
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
FARID AHMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
