Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pary, Christopher v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pary v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv03014
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Director of Central Intelligence, National Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, an American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 1:2013cv01751
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Ten Unknown Named SHU Correctional Officers of FCC Forest City, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Tibal Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, John Doe, L Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
