Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Greene v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, Department of Veterans Affairs, FCI Forrest City Compound Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lindsey
Defendant:
John P Yates, Does Unnamed FBOP (FCI - Forrest City) Staff Members, Individual and Official Capacity and Does Unnamed FBOP (FCI - Forrest City) Staff Members, Individual and Official Capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Does
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
Does Unknown BOP Medical Staff, FCI Forrest City, AR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Romero v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ali Romero
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden of FCI Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stinson v. FCI - Forrest City et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
FCI - Forrest City and Does BOP Medical Staff, Forrest City Low
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thorson v. USA
as 2:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Forrest City Low and USA
Plaintiff:
Corey A Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearce v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv01448
Defendant:
Doe, FCI - Forrest City and USA
Plaintiff:
Charles Pearce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorson v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv00418
Defendant:
T Todd, FMC Fort Worth, McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Corey A Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. USA et al
as 2:2019cv00145
Defendant:
USA and Does Unknown Officers, Forrest City FCI
Plaintiff:
Monty M Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, Wooten, Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
