Cases 71 - 80 of 138
Garcia v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2013cv01611
Plaintiff:
Fernando Garcia
Defendant:
San Diego, City of, San Diego Police Department, Rene Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Nelson Garcia-Soto
as 13-30153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NELSON FERNANDO GARCIA-SOTO
GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ v. USA
as 1:2013cv00442
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Herrera et al v. Best Utica Market, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv02972
Plaintiff:
Angel Tlalmanalco Baes, Manuel Bautista, Catalino Campos and others
Defendant:
Best Utica Market, Inc, Gi Seok Ryang, Hee Ok Ryang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia-Martinez v. USA
as 5:2013cv00074
Petitioner:
Fernando Garcia-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00098
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Fernando Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
A Plus Auto Center et al v. USA
as 2:2012mc01085
Petitioner:
A Plus Auto Center , Fernando Garcia-Rodriguez and Ebelina Valadez-Izarraraz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Puertas et al v. RJ Diving Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv24066
Defendant:
RJ Diving Ventures, Inc. , South Beach Divers, Inc. and Michael Beach
Plaintiff:
Fernando Garcia Puertas and Ramona Vicente Tobajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Fernando Garcia Soto v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73281
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GARCIA SOTO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Garcia-Lozano v. USA
as 4:2012cv02411
Petitioner:
Fernando Garcia-Lozano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
