Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Rodriguez et al v. 852 Eight Gotham Pizza Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04069
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez and Claudio Arias
Defendant:
852 Eight Gotham Pizza Inc., Michael Shamailov and Lana Shamailov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. Willamette Hay Industries, LLC
as 6:2015cv00744
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Willamette Hay Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Socorro v. Premium Global Group, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv23771
Plaintiff:
Albanys Socorro
Defendant:
Premium Global Group, LLC and Fernando Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Grasso v. Cook County et al
as 1:2014cv07807
Plaintiff:
Leonard Grasso
Defendant:
Cook County and Fernando Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14724
Plaintiff:
Lorina Rodriguez and Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Socorro v. Premium Global Group, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv21187
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Socorro
Defendant:
Premium Global Group, LLC and Fernando Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
U.S. Bank National Association v. Pricila Pineda-Ortega et al
as 8:2014cv00354
Defendant:
DOES, Pricila Pineda-Ortega and Fernando Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Nelson Rodriguez Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73867
Petitioner:
NELSON FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Fernando Rodriguez v. Ray Hobb
as 13-3192
Petitioner - Appellant:
Fernando Rodriguez
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Duo-Regen Technologies, LLC v. 4463251 Canada, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02108
Plaintiff:
Duo-Regen Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
4463251 Canada, Inc. , Battery Rejuvenation of South Florida, Inc., Battlife, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
