Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 777
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff: "John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant: New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gustafson-Feis, et al. v. Mayo, et al.
as 24-3686
Plaintiff: LISA GUSTAFSON-FEIS and JULIEN FEIS
Defendant: KEITH MAYO, Doctor, SWEDISH FIRST HILL, CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Leeds et al v. Gilliams et al
as 2:2024cv14170
Plaintiff: Caitlin S. Leeds and Yesenia E. Morales
Defendant: Damien Gilliams, Bonnie Fey-Gilliams and Sharkey's Draft House Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fei Su v. Tesla Motors, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04069
Plaintiff: Fei Su
Defendant: Tesla Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chen et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv03349
Plaintiff: Ting Chen and Xin Yang
Defendant: Yu Chen, Yurong Hu, A Fei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Insurance
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff: ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant: WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff: John Does and Jane Does
Defendant: New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lin v. Garland
as 24-881
Petitioner: SU FEI LIN and YASUMI NAGANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?