Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SEEDS v. NEW JERSEY ARMY NATIONAL GUARD et al
as 1:2017cv07331
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE SEEDS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, 177TH FIGHTER WING AIR NATIONAL GUARD, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Taylor v. 144th Fighter Wing, et .al.
as 2:2012cv02466
Defendant:
144th Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Gary Taylor v. 144th FIGHTER WING et al
as 2:2012at01312
Defendant:
144th FIGHTER WING, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
v. 144th Fighter Wing et al
as 2:2012at01289
Defendant:
144th Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Gomez v. Kurt Neubaurer, et al
as 10-17595
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES GOMEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KURT NEUBAURER, Brigadier General, Commander, 56th Fighter Wing, Luke Air Force Base and MICHAEL BORDERS, Major, Commander, Security Forces, Luke Air Force Base
US Department of the Air Force v. FLRA
as 10-1299
Petitioner:
United States Department of the Air Force, 4th Fighter Wing, Seymour Johnson Air Force Base
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
