Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Young, et al. v. Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., et al.
as 26-5642
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM YOUNG and JENNIFER YOUNG
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO, INC., COMERICA BANK, FIRST BANK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Atmos Financial, PBC v. Climate First Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 6:2026cv01557
Plaintiff:
Atmos Financial, PBC
Defendant:
Climate First Bank, Oneethos, Inc., Marcio DeOliveira and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Kristen Lai v. Huntington Hospital et al
as 2:2026cv07252
Plaintiff:
Kristen Lai
Defendant:
Huntington Hospital, General Group Care Inc., University of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
