Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Malachowski v. USA
as 23-10426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcel Malachowski
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Billy Keith, Warden, FCI Big Spring and others
Turner v. Huffman et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Major FNU Huffman, Lt. Wilbert Williams, Major FNU Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malachowski v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00190
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Billy Keith, FBOP and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel Malachowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross-Steels v. Wright et al
as 6:2018cv00092
Defendant:
COIII FNU Bailey, FNU Bandu, Sgt. FNU Boston and others
Plaintiff:
Princella Valentine Ross-Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross-Steels v. Wright et al
as 6:2018cv00014
Defendant:
FNU Wright, FNU Markum, FNU Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Princella Valentine Ross-Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Princella Steels v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-50576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRINCELLA V. STEELS
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, SERGEANT FNU BUSH and SERGEANT FNU HATCHER
Steels v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00468
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Bush, Sgt. FNU Hatcher and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Princella V. Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Hendricks v. Barry Galloway
as 11-6358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY GALLOWAY, LEROY CARTLEDGE, FNU CURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv03216
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Boles V. Hauser et al
as 8:2007cv01655
Plaintiff:
Graydon Roger Boles
Defendant:
Robert Hauser, FNU Bush, Brian Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
