Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Soward v. Foulds
as 26-20037
Plaintiff:
Shannan Reneace Soward
Defendant:
Andrew Foulds, Officer, In his Official and Individual Capacity and City of Rosenberg
Lois Somerville v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 25-14514
Plaintiff:
LOIS M. SOMERVILLE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Soward v. Foulds et al
as 4:2025cv05325
Plaintiff:
Shannan Reneace Soward
Defendant:
Andrew Foulds and City of Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Foulds v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00666
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Oclevius Lester
Plaintiff:
Gage Michael Foulds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jermaine Branford v. USA, et al
as 21-3246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE BRANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RAUP, Unit Manager, LIEUTENANT CAIN and others
Defendant:
FOULDS, SMITH, Deputy Warden, S.I.S. Lieutenant and NEWTON, Counselor
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ansley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Defendant:
Ms. Learn, Unit Manager Dunn, Security Lt. Stuvola and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence O. Ansley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Foulds et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Lisa Rovelli, Renee Foulds, Jen Pizzoli and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. McGinley et al
as 1:2020cv02270
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Major R. Fould, Walter Hex, Superintendant Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL OFFICE, SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY and others
Petitioner:
ACEY REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
