Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Jones et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2011cv03470
Plaintiff:
Nellie Jones , Frank Jones , D.S.J. and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Eriberto Perez-Angeles and Omar Daza-Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, JILL MONAS, JASON ASHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2011cv02982
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frank Jones v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 11-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent, SCI-Fayette and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
JONES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv07429
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DeLollis et al v. Draper et al
as 2:2010cv04340
Plaintiff:
John DeLollis, Todd Helfrich, Aaron Hilger and others
Defendant:
Michael Draper, Ben Glenn, Douglas McCarron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frank Jones v. Calipatria State Prison
as 10-71705
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON
CARROLL et al v. STETTLER et al
as 2:2010cv02262
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARROLL and KIMBERLY BAKER
Defendant:
WILLIAM STETTLER, III, STETTY B84 CONSULTING, INC., IDN ENTERPRISES CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv02021
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
