Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Charles Jones v. Jerry Hobeck, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, Police Officer, JUDITH P. PETRUSH, District Attorney and FRANK PALLONE, JR., Magisterial District Judge
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Petty v. Leahy et al
as 2:2009cv14225
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Petty
Defendant:
Patrick J Leahy, Edward M Kennedy, Sheldon Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Southeast Alaska, et al v. USACE, et al
as 06-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TIMOTHY J. GALLAGHER, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, LARRY L. REEDER, in his official capacity of Chief of the Regulatory Branch and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
COEUR ALASKA, INC., GOLDBELT, INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN RIVERS, CLEAN WATER ACTION NETWORK, COOK INLETKEEPER and others
ROYANEH et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
as 3:2005cv01617
Defendant:
AL SHARPTON, JEFFREY SPRUILL, DONALD M. PAYNE and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICE ROYANEH and LORD NOBLE WYSDOM EL PHARAZ BIGELOW ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
