Cases 41 - 50 of 361
JENNINGS et al v. CARVANA LLC
as 5:2021cv05400
Plaintiff:
DANA JENNINGS and JOSEPH A. FURLONG
Defendant:
CARVANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNINGS et al v. CARVANA LLC
as 2:2021cv05400
Plaintiff:
DANA JENNINGS and JOSEPH A. FURLONG
Defendant:
CARVANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Furlong v. CSAA General Insurance et al
as 2:2021cv01788
Plaintiff:
Margaret Furlong
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance a foreign company authorized to do business in Arizona doing business as AAA Auto and Home Insurance and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph Jarvis v. Hines Furlong Line, Inc.
as 21-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HINES FURLONG LINE, INC.
FURLONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56130
Plaintiff:
KYLE W FURLONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv05076
Plaintiff:
Homeland Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's USA, LLC, D.A.L.L. Anointed, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Savoy v. Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11537
Plaintiff:
Richard Savoy
Defendant:
Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., Anthony Dechellis, Stephen M. Waters and others
Garcia v. Furlong et al
as 3:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kyle-Abran Garcia and Kyle Abran Garcia
Defendant:
Ken Furlong, Brett Bindley and Public Servant Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Batton v. Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SARA BATTON
Defendant:
SANDUSKY COUNTY OHIO, SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SANDUSKY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Furlong v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
David Furlong
Defendant:
Manuel Gonzales and Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
