Cases 1 - 10 of 1,653
Herrera v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv05786
Defendant:
G. Verdusco, S. Ramirez, R. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marmol v. Farley
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Samuel Marmol
Defendant:
Wallace Daniel Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Comcast Corporation et al v. United States Department Of Labor et al
as 1:2024cv01401
Defendant:
United States Department Of Labor, William P. Farley and Julie A. Su
Plaintiff:
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and Comcast Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Guzman v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv12080
Defendant:
John T. Lawler, James D. Farley, Jr. and Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Albert Guzman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Farley v. WalMart Inc.
as 1:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Farley
Defendant:
WalMart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Erickson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Defendant:
IDOC, Carter Jr, Galipeau and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah E Erickson and Jeremiah Erickson
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03357
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN FARLEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALL v. NISBET et al
as 2:2024cv03301
Defendant:
ABINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPAL BUILDING, RAYMOND TOWNSEND, OSWALDO TOLEDO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Darin Earl et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv05394
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eden, Brian Ebel, Nathan Edwards and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.