Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Shakeyra Bradley v. US Postal Service Headquarters, et al
as 26-12571
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE HEADQUARTERS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, FED EX SHIPCENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kristen Lai v. Huntington Hospital et al
as 2:2026cv07252
Plaintiff:
Kristen Lai
Defendant:
Huntington Hospital, General Group Care Inc., University of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Bradley v. US Postal Service Headquarters et al
as 1:2025cv07165
Plaintiff:
Shakeyra K Bradley
Defendant:
US Postal Service Headquarters, US Postal Service, Fed Ex Shipcenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Novy v. Delta Community Credit Union et al
as 4:2025cv00300
Plaintiff:
Angie Novy
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank, Cosmo Pro, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Leathers v. Fed Ex
as 1:2025cv00390
Plaintiff:
George Leathers
Defendant:
Fed Ex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
