Cases 41 - 50 of 205
CitiMortgage Inc v. Gonzalez-Ramos
as 3:2016cv01274
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
Defendant:
Fernando Gonzalez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERICAN HALAL LIVE POULTRY, LLC., et al v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, et al
as 2:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HALAL LIVE POULTRY, LLC and WAHID ABDUL
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX , FERNANDO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lliguichuzhca et al v. Food For Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ruben Hernandez , Erik Fernando Gonzalez , Homar Flores Ramales and others
Defendant:
Food For Health, Inc. and Youcef Guernah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2015cv00135
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez and Cynthia Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gonzalez v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61353
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Chandler, Warden F.C.I. Fort Worth
as 4:2015cv00399
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez
Respondent:
Chandler, Warden F.C.I. Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02847
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ and ROXANNE MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL A. NUTTER, CHARLES H. RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Gonzalez-Arsayuz v. Warden
as 15-10294
Petitioner - Appellant:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ARSAYUZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Gonzalez-Arsayuz v. Stone
as 3:2014cv00099
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez-Arsayuz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Carlos Betancourt-Gonzalez
as 14-20282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS EFREN BETANCOURT-GONZALEZ, also known as Carlos Efren Betancourt, also known as Fernando Gonzalez, also known as Carlos Efren Betancourt Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
