Cases 1 - 10 of 12
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, R. MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v. VARNER et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIC CEASAR
Defendant:
D. VARNER, KERRI MOORE, T. BIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ficus Villas Condo Association v. Hartford Steam Boiler
as 20-12166
Defendant / Appellant:
HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE CO.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FICUS VILLAS CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC.
Ficus Villas Condo Association, Inc. v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.
as 1:2020cv21882
Defendant:
Hartford Steam Broiler Inspection and Insurance Company and Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Ficus Villas Condo Association and Ficus Villas Condo Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
as 19-2687
Not Yet Classified:
SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner and others
EHR Concepts, LLC v. The Ficus Consulting Group, LLC
as 3:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
EHR Concepts, LLC
Defendant:
The Ficus Consulting Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santin-Sanchez et al v. Ficus Mexican Bar & Grill PR, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Santin-Sanchez , Joshua D. Robles-Cancel , Michael Sauri and others
Defendant:
Ficus Mexican Bar & Grill PR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Meek v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02840
Plaintiff:
Asa Meek
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes Zavaras, Kevin Milyard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meek v. Ficus
as 1:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
Asa M. Meek
Defendant:
Ficus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
