Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Fielding Stanley Crosby
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Barefoot v. Fields, et al.
as 5:2023ct03293
Plaintiff:
Otha Ray Barefoot
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Tia N. Fields, Officer A. Colaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Herbert Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Walters v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2023ct03207
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Walters
Defendant:
Shanticia Hawkins, Unit Manager Reams, John Doe Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BELTON v. FIELDS
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
DARREN S. BELTON
Defendant:
RONNIE FIELDS, BILL FLINT, MS. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, RONNIE FIELDS, MS. BONNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
