Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Cox v. Boyd
as 1:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Peggy Holliday Cox and Raymond Moyer Cox
Defendant:
Sherman W. Boyd and Gas Field Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Fredeking & Biser Law Offices, PLLC
as 3:2021mc00098
In Re:
Subpoena Issued to Fredeking & Biser Law Offices, LLC
Petitioner:
Sowards Oil Field Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John R. Giese
Defendant:
Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Field v. Phillip Morris, USA, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
Phillip Morris, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Field et al v. Facemire et al
as 5:2021cv00198
Defendant:
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and James A. Facemire
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Field and Robin M. Field
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field et al v. Nanney et al
as 5:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Jackie Nanney and G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Field and Robin M. Field
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field, Jr. v. Jividen et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Betsy Jividen and Bryan Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. King et al
as 2:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Melissa Fields and Michael A. Nichols
Defendant:
Roane County Commission, Sheriff L. Todd Cole and Deputy Sheriff Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foltz v. Fields et al
as 3:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Robert Webster Fields, Jr., Turner Transportation Group Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10
Plaintiff:
Mark Bradley Foltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
