Cases 1 - 9 of 9
King v. Gaffney et al
as 4:2019cv00464
Defendant:
L MASH LLP, Jamie Gaffney, Floyd R. Brown, Jr. & Company and others
Garnishee:
Hanover Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ralph King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bacher et al v. Solvetta, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2018cv61502
Defendant:
Solvetta, L.L.C., Rita Floyd-Vester and Csaba Vester
Plaintiff:
Steven Gula and John Bacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Penguins Book Publishing USA, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Penguins Book Publishing USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Key Bank National Association v. Floyd
as 1:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Key Bank National Association
Defendant:
Michael W. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
La Four v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2011cv03644
Plaintiff:
Floyd D. La Four
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart et al v. Brighton Cemetery, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00768
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Stewart , Joel Debruce , Sameria Harris and others
Defendant:
Brighton Cemetery, Inc. , R. L. Lumzy Funeral Service, R L Lumzy, Jr. and others
Garnishee:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tri-States Utility, Inc. v. Mars Company, A Division of Floyd S. Salser, Jr. & Assoc. et al
as 6:2009cv03388
Plaintiff:
Tri-States Utility, Inc.
Defendant:
Mars Company, A Division of Floyd S. Salser, Jr. & Assoc., Water Products, Inc., Old National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Caraway et al v. Chesapeake Exploration LLC
as 1:2009cv00298
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration LLC
Plaintiff:
Don R. Caraway, Rose M. Adams, Felicia Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Floyd et al v. Community Bank
as 2:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Wyman Floyd and Kathleen Floyd
Defendant:
Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
