Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01599
Plaintiff: Steven Floyd
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant: Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manookian v. Flippin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00350
Defendant: Jody Pickens, Jimmie Miller, Bridget J. Willhite and others
Plaintiff: Brian Manookian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
In re: Shawne Alston, et al v. NCAA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15566
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENDALL TIMMONS, ALEX LAURICELLA, INDIA CHANEY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC., NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, The NCAA, MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Intervenor: AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., CBS BROADCASTING, INC., ESPN ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS and others
In re: Darrin Duncan, et al v. NCAA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15054
: In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHAWNE ALSTON, MARTIN JENKINS, JOHNATHAN MOORE and others
Objector - Appellant: DARRIN DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, The NCAA, PACIFIC 12 CONFERENCE, CONFERENCE USA and others
AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00089
Counter Defendant: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: BAPTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. and FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Counter Claimant: FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv02169
Plaintiff: Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff: Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court: Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jennifer Milici
Interested Party: Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner: NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff: Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?